Which deduction is used when a split is missing 90 degrees or more?

Which deduction is used when a split is missing 90 degrees or more?

• A. Lower vp
• B. Insufficient height of aerials & acro flights with hand support
• C. Insufficiant split when required (dance/acro element)- missing 21-45 degrees
• D. Insufficiant split when required (dance/acro element)- missing 90 degrees or more

Answer: (D)

The main idea here is that scoring rules assign deductions based on how much a required split is missing. In a dance/acro element, achieving a full split is often required, and the amount you fall short is measured in degrees. When the split is missing 90 degrees or more, that’s a substantial shortfall, so there is a specific deduction category for an insufficient split at that level. This option matches that threshold exactly, signaling a large gap from the expected split. It’s distinct from other possible deductions, such as not reaching sufficient height in aerials or smaller shortfalls (like 21–45 degrees), which are governed by different criteria. So the 90 degrees or more shortfall triggers the deduction for an insufficient split in a dance/acro element.

The main idea here is that scoring rules assign deductions based on how much a required split is missing. In a dance/acro element, achieving a full split is often required, and the amount you fall short is measured in degrees. When the split is missing 90 degrees or more, that’s a substantial shortfall, so there is a specific deduction category for an insufficient split at that level.

This option matches that threshold exactly, signaling a large gap from the expected split. It’s distinct from other possible deductions, such as not reaching sufficient height in aerials or smaller shortfalls (like 21–45 degrees), which are governed by different criteria. So the 90 degrees or more shortfall triggers the deduction for an insufficient split in a dance/acro element.