Which criterion pertains to the height of aerials and acro flights with hand support?

Which criterion pertains to the height of aerials and acro flights with hand support?

• A. Insufficient height of leaps/jumps/hops
• B. Insufficient height of aerials & acro flights with hand support
• C. Leg not parallel to floor in splits or straddle pike
• D. Lower vp

Answer: (B)

The key idea is how height is judged for aerials and acro flights that involve hand support. In floor routines, there are separate height criteria for different element types, and for aerials plus acro flights with hand support, the judge looks specifically at whether the element reaches the required height. If the element doesn’t achieve enough height, there’s a deduction called insufficient height for those movements. That direct reference to the height of aerials and acro flights with hand support is why this option is the right one. The other choices touch on other aspects—like leg position in splits, or a different element category—rather than the height criterion for these particular elements.

The key idea is how height is judged for aerials and acro flights that involve hand support. In floor routines, there are separate height criteria for different element types, and for aerials plus acro flights with hand support, the judge looks specifically at whether the element reaches the required height. If the element doesn’t achieve enough height, there’s a deduction called insufficient height for those movements. That direct reference to the height of aerials and acro flights with hand support is why this option is the right one. The other choices touch on other aspects—like leg position in splits, or a different element category—rather than the height criterion for these particular elements.